Delivering High Quality Impact Assessments
HC 128, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, Session 2008-2009
- National Audit Office (NAO)
- TSO (The Stationery Office)
Government is committed to conducting formal impact assessments of the need for and likely impact of new regulations. This National Audit Office report, 'Delivering High Quality Impact Assessments (HC 128)', finds that scrutiny of proposed legislation is strengthening and that the standard is better than it was.
One fifth of assessments, however, still do not include any quantified data to assess costs or benefits. The Better Regulation Executive (BRE) has introduced new guidance, templates and training to improve the quality of impact assessments and, as a result, impact assessments have clearer presentation of results, better planning for implementation, and more quantification of costs and benefits.
Wide variation remains, however, between the best and worst impact assessments. Where they are done well, the impact assessments include a clear statement of the policy problem, make good use of consultation and have clear recommendations. On the other hand, only 20% of impact assessments presented the results of an evaluation of a range of regulatory options.
Many impact assessments did not pay enough attention to compliance and enforcement issues. For example, only one third of assessments assessed the cost of enforcement for the preferred option.
There have been improvements in the analysis of costs and benefits. In 2008, 67% of impact assessments quantified costs and 60% quantified benefits. Under the previous arrangements, the figures were 56% for quantified costs and 40% for quantified benefits. There is, however, still wide variation in the level of evidence provided and insufficient analysis in the weaker impact assessments.
|Format||Paperback||Published||30 Jan 2009|
|Availability||Colour copy: 3 - 5 days||Delivery||Delivery options and charges|